Selects the option that would win a majority of votes against each of the other options.
[Module pages are works in progress]
Condorcet is an election method that selects the candidate, if such a candidate exists, that would win a majority vote against all other candidates. Ballots may take the form of either a single ranked choice vote or a sequence of runoffs.
There is not always a “Condorcet winner,” and various implementations provide differing methods of determining a winner in such cases.
Input: preferential vote or runoffs
Output: Condorcet winner or circular paradox
The Condorcet method takes its name from an early promoter, the 18th-century French mathematician Marie Jean Antoine Nicolas Caritat, who was the Marquis de Condorcet. The method itself was first described by Ramon Llull in 1299. A version of it is used in Robert’s Rules of Order, first published in 1876.
Recently, it has attracted the interest of software developers and has been adopted by several prominent Free Software communities and Pirate Party groups.
- Prevents some potential for gaming that is possible in other voting methods
- The complexity of the system may lead to confusion
- Free Software communities
- Pirate Party of Sweden uses it for primary elections
- Condorcet Internet Voting Service at Cornell University
- “Condorcet method” at Wikipedia
- Schulze, Markus. “A new monotonic, clone-independent, reversal symmetric, and condorcet-consistent single-winner election method.” Social Choice and Welfare 36, no. 2 (February 2011).