federation, friendship, membership, multicameralism, ritual, separation of powers, stake weight

Agreements are implemented through ad hoc juries made up of randomly selected members. A community administrator oversees the process and has the capacity to remove community members.

secrecy, solidarity, transparency

Any community member has the right and responsibility to evaluate others' behavior.

ownership

do-ocracy, friendship, membership, reputation

exclusion, friendship, reputation

A member found by a jury to have broken an agreement once receives a warning. The second time, the member is suspended for one week. The third time, the member is suspended for one year, after which the process resets at the second stage.

delegation, representation, separation of powers

fact-finding, ranked choice, representation, reputation, sortition, term limits

Jury members serve only one complaint at a time.

This community regards the Contributor Covenant (contributor-covenant.org) as its body of policies.

disapproval voting, do-ocracy, holographic consensus, quadratic voting, referendum, representation, sortition

When a complaint about a community member is submitted to the administrator, a jury is formed to determine whether a violation has occurred. Juries consist of 5 community members selected at random for each complaint. If at least 4 members concur that the complaint accurately reflects the community agreements, the complaint triggers the appropriate consequence.

exclusion, lazy consensus, restorative justice

The community administrator is responsible for administering the jury process and carrying out the juries' conclusions.

board, disapproval voting, jury, precedent, refusal, rough consensus

The community administrator monitors the jury processes to ensure they appear fair.

A special jury may be called to consider a proposed modification to this Rule, and all jury members must agree to the modification for it to pass.